🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours prior to the New York mayoral election, Michael Lange made a significant forecast – going beyond who would win citywide, but precinct by precinct. Lange, a political analyst who grew up in the city, devoted more than ten years in progressive politics and has become something of a local celebrity recently for his deep dives into city data and polling.

He published his highly detailed prediction map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate was victorious while failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his Substack, the Narrative War. Lange has a flair for clever terms. He highlighted, as an example, the split between the “commie corridor”, running from one neighborhood to another area to Astoria, where he predicted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, “the Free Press and financial newspapers surpass the New York Times” in audience and the majority of electors favored the independent, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Trends and Surprises

What was your night?

It was necessary because they were dropping around 200,000 votes into the tally every few minutes! I felt somewhat anxious at the beginning: Mamdani was ahead the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but there were large groups of votes added later and his lead went from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

You know, there was a world in which yesterday turned out kind of poorly for him, in which Cuomo was going to end up basically doubling his votes from the earlier contest. However Mamdani gained half a million votes to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He campaigned and greatly broadened his base from the primary.

Coalition Building

How did the mayor-elect gain additional support from?

He built the coalition that the left long aimed for: diverse racially, it’s young, it’s renters and individuals squeezed by affordability. He gained significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the primary. Plus he boosted his base of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He built the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: multiracial, young, renters and people struggling with costs

There were also a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It is a genuine phenomenon, confined to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Islamic voters. Voters in immigrant strongholds that supported Trump previously went for Zohran now. However it’s not that he was gaining white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Effects

A major development of the night was the record participation. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Turnout was much greater than I had expected. I figured it could exceed 2 million, but it reached 2.3M – that is a huge number of participants. Existed a substantial opposition group, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that sufficed to win.

You forecasted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Currently it appears he’s likely to surpass 50%. He has just over 50% but there’s still probably 200,000 votes uncounted at that time. Thus it’s not it’s definitive, but I believe it’s likely, and I wish he achieves it because afterwards no one can say the Republican was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His support completely collapsed.

He didn’t win any district in any area. Including one neighborhood in the borough, which is like an highly conservative area. That truly surprised me. The independent kept Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained many Republicans on Staten Island with a high participation. I think occurred a lot of tactical voting by the Republicans. They were doing it before the former president endorsed for the candidate, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome if the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your often-discussed “commie corridor” – was support for the candidate dominant in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view existed some weakening of the progressive zone in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, instance, the property owners and homeowners supported Cuomo. So there existed a little resistance. But overall, largely the leftist base is another huge reason why Zohran won – he was polling between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the vote we reported on if Mamdani was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he did?

There are neighborhoods with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. But in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Upper East Side, his position on Israel definitely mattered there. Likewise in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned the independent. Plus, there are Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in the borough, they were strongly Cuomo. Therefore it’s unclear if there were major surprises on this one, but he did hold left-leaning areas and even parts of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what New York means politically? Will progressive base serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that key figures from progressives come from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that there will be additional examples – people will come from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

However I think that every city in the US could develop their own commie corridor. Cities are the epicenters of progressive influence in America – because youth reside there, people rent and they represent locales where people are crushed by the disparities we face.